Escondido, CA
Fog
Fog
62°F
 

Candidate Grove wants to provide access to safe, quality health care


Vicki F. Grove is a candidate for Zone 2 of the Palomar Health hospital board. Zone 2 includes some parts of Escondido. Note: In the original version of this article we stated that it included most of Escondido. That was incorrect.

A resident of North County for 20 years and of Escondido for five years, Grove is a licensed marriage and family therapy counselor with clients all over North County. She has a biology degree from UC Davis and an MA degree in counseling. Before she opened her practice, Grove did work with at-risk youths, survivors of human trafficking and with bereaved families at Elizabeth Hospice.

“As a marriage and family therapist who specializes in trauma, I have been hearing a lot about trauma in recent months and how it has really taken a toll,” said Grove. “I’ve also been hearing from my husband who is a surgeon. I decided it was time to step up and advocate for my patients and others.”

She has watched the hospital board meetings remotely, “and they are frankly quite embarrassing,” she said. “That’s another reason why I’m running. The directors act like a feuding married couple. I’d like to help them work together in the spirit of collaboration instead of hostility. I think they could use a marriage and family therapist.”

She added, “They argue about just about everything. There is little they don’t argue about. They are not a unified board by any means.”

The issues she wants to focus on are “access to safe quality health care for all residents of the district, not just COVID patients. Also maintaining the safety and wellness of our healthcare workers—not just their physical wellness but their morale. The big one is supporting the expansion of mental health services as we recover.”

There is “so much fear” out there added onto other worries people have related to COVID, she said. “This all has to be done while keeping the district financially viable,” she said.

The district’s financial well-being is also a big issue, one that she feels is not being addressed adequately by the board. “It’s a complicated question and takes a lot of critical thinking and thoughtful collaboration because there are so many factors to be accounted for,” she said. “It’s a difficult job because some things clearly need to be cut for other things to happen.”

Cutting the CEO’s and some executives’ salaries have been discussed. “I’m not sure if I would be in favor of that but I am open to it,” she said. “The CEOs make a lot of money and that’s a big cost for the district. I’m a therapist, it’s part or my job to look at things critically and not make kneejerk decisions. That’s something I think is important and it requires the emotional intelligence I bring to the board.”

In reaching out to voters, Grove has found that “their concern is to expand mental health and I’m happy the district is already answering that call. It would be irresponsible not to elect a mental health professional to the board. I’ve made a career of serving my community. My calm critical thinking and ability to build relationships is imperative right now. If you don’t want four more years of a non-unified board, then vote for me.”

One response to “Candidate Grove wants to provide access to safe, quality health care”

  1. Michael Hunsaker says:

    The Palomar Hospital District has severe financial issues and the community may soon see their tax bills go up to fill in the opening gaps. The board is led by Dr. Engel who has severe conflicts of interest along with “private partners”and is personally benefiting from his position.
    The huge increases for the CEO’s compensation are not justified and inappropriate given the sinking fortunes of the District. Recordings of meetings are immediately erased to eliminate [embarrassing?] records. A majority of the Board can invent reasons to throw off dissident Board members who foresee the problems when the net worth of the district has shrink by 20% for two years in a row. Fiscally sensitive board members led by Kumara and Clark are questioning the bad financial status and a bare majority led by Engel and Greer vote to reward bad policies and finance.
    Getting these factions together is folly. This feud is on hard drawn lines – survival of the District or turning it over to insiders. You should cover Kumara’s campaign as well for balance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *